Energy savings claims, verified under the scheme you apply.
Energy efficiency obligations produce the same need: proof that each operation is eligible, complete and consistent. Ceertia verifies it on arrival, against the scheme rules and the sources of truth you designate.
Why these cases pile up
Energy savings programs bring in large volumes of operations from installers and partners.
Each operation is checked by hand for eligibility, dates, installer qualification and matching equipment references.
An ineligible operation found at audit is lost, along with the time spent on it.
What Ceertia actually asks
Is the beneficiary identical on the quote, the invoice and the signed statement?
Was the installer's qualification valid at the commitment date?
Are the mandatory scheme mentions present?
Do equipment references and technical data match between quote, invoice and photos?
Is the date sequence plausible: commitment, works, invoice, completion?
Every question is a rule. Every answer is a verdict with its evidence.
One risk level per case, always sourced
Ceertia also cross-checks each case against the official public registries connected for your use case and against your own history.
Your team keeps the decision
Every verdict comes with what Ceertia saw, where, and why it concluded. Your reviewers decide, with a full audit log.
Case studies
A European energy supplier meeting a national savings obligation through works submitted by its installer partners.
Read the case Energy efficiency · Illustrative scenarioA program operator scales its partner network without scaling its back officeA program operator aggregating savings operations on behalf of several energy suppliers, growing its installer network faster than it could hire reviewers.
Read the case Energy efficiency · Illustrative scenarioDefending two years of decisions in a regulator auditAn energy supplier asked by its supervisory body to justify past decisions on a sample, under rules that had been revised since.
Read the case