Inspection and certification on verified ground.
Reports, certificates and accreditations have to agree with each other. Ceertia checks them against each other and against your accreditation records before anything is issued.
Why these cases pile up
Every inspection produces reports, certificates and calibration records that have to agree with each other.
Checking accreditations, equipment references and signatures by hand slows every issuance down.
A certificate issued on a lapsed accreditation puts your own accreditation at stake.
What Ceertia actually asks
Was the inspector's accreditation valid on the inspection date?
Does the equipment reference match across report, certificate and datasheet?
Was the instrument calibrated at the time of measurement?
Are the mandatory scheme mentions present?
Is the report signed by an authorized person?
Every question is a rule. Every answer is a verdict with its evidence.
One risk level per case, always sourced
Ceertia also cross-checks each case against the official public registries connected for your use case and against your own history.
Your team keeps the decision
Every verdict comes with what Ceertia saw, where, and why it concluded. Your reviewers decide, with a full audit log.
Case studies
An inspection body issuing certificates across several schemes, where an inspector’s accreditation had once expired mid-campaign without anyone noticing.
Read the case Inspection · Illustrative scenarioOne equipment reference, checked across every report and certificateA certification body running multi-site campaigns where the report, the certificate and the datasheet had to describe the same equipment, and sometimes did not.
Read the case Laboratory · Illustrative scenarioTest results that always trace back to a calibrated instrumentA testing laboratory whose accreditation depended on proving that every result came from an instrument calibrated at the time of measurement.
Read the case