Public decisions that hold up on appeal.
Permits, bids and benefit claims checked for completeness and consistency, with the evidence kept for every decision.
Why these cases pile up
Permits, bids and benefit claims arrive faster than case officers can check them.
Completeness, identity and certificate dates are verified by hand, often while a statutory clock is running.
A decision taken on an incomplete case is the one that comes back on appeal.
What Ceertia actually asks
Is the permit application complete before the statutory clock starts?
Does the bidder meet every administrative requirement?
Are the declared identity and address consistent across the application?
Are supporting certificates current at the decision date?
Has this claim already been decided under another reference?
Every question is a rule. Every answer is a verdict with its evidence.
One risk level per case, always sourced
Ceertia also cross-checks each case against the official public registries connected for your use case and against your own history.
Your team keeps the decision
Every verdict comes with what Ceertia saw, where, and why it concluded. Your reviewers decide, with a full audit log.
Case studies
A municipal planning department where the legal response period began on receipt, whether or not the application was complete.
Read the case Government · Illustrative scenarioBids assessed on merit, once compliance is settledA public procurement office where every tender opened with a long administrative compliance check before technical evaluation could begin.
Read the case Government · Illustrative scenarioBenefit decisions that survive an appealA social benefits agency whose refusals were regularly appealed, and whose cases could not always show what had been checked.
Read the caseOrNsoft registrations: SAM registered · CAGE 0B2Q6 · UEI T9NPFG9J21J9 · UNGM registered · Vendor 415361.