Insurance claims that hold together.
A claim has to tell one consistent story: declaration, invoices, photos, expert reports, policy. Ceertia checks that story at intake, before an adjuster spends a minute on it.
Why these cases pile up
Claims arrive in waves, after every storm and every busy season.
For each one, an adjuster reads the declaration, invoices, photos and expert reports against each other by hand.
A reused invoice or a date out of sequence is easy to miss when the queue keeps growing.
What Ceertia actually asks
Is the insured's identity consistent between the declaration and the repair invoice?
Is the loss date before the repair invoice date?
Do amounts match between the repair quote and the final invoice?
Has this invoice already been used on another claim?
Is the claimed damage consistent with the photos and the expert report?
Every question is a rule. Every answer is a verdict with its evidence.
One risk level per case, always sourced
Ceertia also cross-checks each case against the official public registries connected for your use case and against your own history.
Your team keeps the decision
Every verdict comes with what Ceertia saw, where, and why it concluded. Your reviewers decide, with a full audit log.
Case studies
A mid-sized insurer receiving motor claims from policyholders, garages and experts, with volumes that spike after every storm.
Read the case Insurance · Illustrative scenarioCatching the same invoice submitted on three different claimsA property insurer that suspected the same repair evidence was being presented on more than one claim, but had no way to see across its portfolio.
Read the case Insurance · Illustrative scenarioBrokers fix their own incomplete claimsAn insurer receiving claims through a network of brokers, where every incomplete submission meant a phone call and a delay.
Read the case