Grant applications checked before public money moves.
Eligibility, completeness and consistency, verified on arrival. Your reviewers assess merit on applications that are already complete.
Why these cases pile up
Applications arrive all at once, right before the deadline.
Reviewers check eligibility, signatures and budgets line by line before they can assess merit.
A project funded twice, or paid on an incomplete application, is public money that is hard to recover.
What Ceertia actually asks
Is the applicant eligible under the program rules at the application date?
Is every required item present and signed?
Do quotes, invoices and the funded budget agree?
Has the same project been claimed under another program?
Does the completion report match the funded project?
Every question is a rule. Every answer is a verdict with its evidence.
One risk level per case, always sourced
Ceertia also cross-checks each case against the official public registries connected for your use case and against your own history.
Your team keeps the decision
Every verdict comes with what Ceertia saw, where, and why it concluded. Your reviewers decide, with a full audit log.
Case studies
A regional grant program receiving most of its applications in the final days before a statutory deadline.
Read the case Grants · Illustrative scenarioThe same project, funded twice, caught before paymentA subsidy authority that suspected some projects were being claimed under more than one program, but reviewed each application in isolation.
Read the case Grants · Illustrative scenarioCompletion reports that match the funded projectA public body releasing the final installment of a grant on the strength of a completion report, and finding, sometimes, that the work described was not the work funded.
Read the caseOrNsoft registrations: SAM registered · CAGE 0B2Q6 · UEI T9NPFG9J21J9 · UNGM registered · Vendor 415361.